The Debates

[Locke]

Roundabout is the best term to describe the Progressive Conservative constituent. The majority of what Ed Stelmach expressed was either
a. Patently untrue
b. Irrelevant
If anyone else watched it, what did you gather? It seems to me that it is a spectacle in which the leaders fumble around for some time spewing rhetoric. I was, however, duly impressed with Brian Mason.

[Mitch]

Ya, I watched it. Got absolutely nothing out of it. I wanted to slap the Wild Rose Alliance dude (forgot his name) across the face, as well as the people who organized the event, they had absolutely no time to get their points across.
Brian Mason did quite well in the debates this time, to my amazement. However, I wasn't very impressed with Kevin Taft, why was he going after Mason and not the one that is currently in power?? *sigh*
I agree, almost anything Stelmach said was untrue. Even his ads in his campaign were completely and obviously untrue ("the right change for Alberta" :p HAHA). Stelmach never really took a position, he just repeated random things that were in his ad campaigns; housing, health care, etc.

[Locke]

Ya, I watched it. Got absolutely nothing out of it. I wanted to slap the Wild Rose Alliance dude (forgot his name) across the face, as well as the people who organized the event, they had absolutely no time to get their points across.
Brian Mason did quite well in the debates this time, to my amazement. However, I wasn't very impressed with Kevin Taft, why was he going after Mason and not the one that is currently in power?? *sigh*
I agree, almost anything Stelmach said was untrue. Even his ads in his campaign were completely and obviously untrue ("the right change for Alberta" :p HAHA). Stelmach never really took a position, he just repeated random things that were in his ad campaigns; housing, health care, etc.

I found that Brian Mason was the only one who wasn't pushing a partisan agenda. The others failed to confront any issues whatsoever (apart from the Paul Hinman [Wild Rose Alliance] - yet his affronts to Ed Stelmach were made with the goal of attracting "fiscally responsible" conservatives. There's no real reason to believe him.)